2023年臺(tái)灣考研英語考試模擬卷（6）

《2023年臺(tái)灣考研英語考試模擬卷（6）》由會(huì)員分享，可在線閱讀，更多相關(guān)《2023年臺(tái)灣考研英語考試模擬卷（6）（101頁珍藏版）》請(qǐng)?jiān)谘b配圖網(wǎng)上搜索。

1、2023年臺(tái)灣考研英語考試模擬卷（6） 本卷共分為1大題50小題，作答時(shí)間為180分鐘，總分100分，60分及格。 一、單項(xiàng)選擇題（共50題，每題2分。每題的備選項(xiàng)中，只有一個(gè)最符合題意） 1.A month ago, the British government announced a plan to keep terrorist suspects indefinitely under house arrest (1) the home secretary’s say-so, It has been attacked from al

2、l sides ever since. This week the government backtracked. Under the Prevention of Terrorism bill, (2) to Parliament this week, house arrest would (3) a potential (4) in the government’s ever-expanding anti-terrorist arsenal, but the government would first have to (5) of Article 5 of the Europe

3、an Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing a right to liberty. Parliament would have to vote on that.The government could do this (6) the terrorist threat to Britain, already described by the government as (7) , got even worse. Even then, the powers would remain (8) by political and judicial safegu

4、ards. Before the home secretary could make a house-arrest order, he would have to be satisfied on the (9) of probabilities--no longer on the basis of reasonable suspicion --that the suspect has been involved in a terrorism-related activity. He would also have to be (10) that such an order was strict

5、ly required. The period of house-arrest will be limited to a maximum of six months, extendable through a new house-arrest order. Within seven days of its being imposed, the High Court would have to confirm that the home secretary had (11) grounds for making such an order. Even if it were so satisfi

6、ed, the case would go on to a full court (12) The bill also provides for a whole range of lesser restrictions including tagging, curfews, a ban on association with specified people, prohibitions on using phones, restrictions on travel, and so on. (13) to meet the threat (14) by each suspect and limi

7、ted to a renewable period of 12 months, these would not be subject to the same judicial scrutiny as house arrest. Nor would they require (15) from the European convention.But the new orders, including house arrest, would be used only where a suspected terrorist could not be prosecuted (16) because t

8、he evidence against him was not admissible in court, or because it might (17) intelligence sources or (18) techniques. Charles Clarke insists that he would prefer to prosecute. (19) the home secretary is considering further anti-terrorist legislation, including making it (20) to be involved in the

9、preparation or commission of terrorist acts.12（） A．taken B．introduced C．mentioned D．pat out 2.A month ago, the British government announced a plan to keep terrorist suspects indefinitely under house arrest (1) the home secretary’s say-so, It has been attacked from all sides ever since.

10、This week the government backtracked. Under the Prevention of Terrorism bill, (2) to Parliament this week, house arrest would (3) a potential (4) in the government’s ever-expanding anti-terrorist arsenal, but the government would first have to (5) of Article 5 of the European Convention on Hum

11、an Rights guaranteeing a right to liberty. Parliament would have to vote on that.The government could do this (6) the terrorist threat to Britain, already described by the government as (7) , got even worse. Even then, the powers would remain (8) by political and judicial safeguards. Before the hom

12、e secretary could make a house-arrest order, he would have to be satisfied on the (9) of probabilities--no longer on the basis of reasonable suspicion --that the suspect has been involved in a terrorism-related activity. He would also have to be (10) that such an order was strictly required. The per

13、iod of house-arrest will be limited to a maximum of six months, extendable through a new house-arrest order. Within seven days of its being imposed, the High Court would have to confirm that the home secretary had (11) grounds for making such an order. Even if it were so satisfied, the case would g

14、o on to a full court (12) The bill also provides for a whole range of lesser restrictions including tagging, curfews, a ban on association with specified people, prohibitions on using phones, restrictions on travel, and so on. (13) to meet the threat (14) by each suspect and limited to a renewable p

15、eriod of 12 months, these would not be subject to the same judicial scrutiny as house arrest. Nor would they require (15) from the European convention.But the new orders, including house arrest, would be used only where a suspected terrorist could not be prosecuted (16) because the evidence against

16、him was not admissible in court, or because it might (17) intelligence sources or (18) techniques. Charles Clarke insists that he would prefer to prosecute. (19) the home secretary is considering further anti-terrorist legislation, including making it (20) to be involved in the preparation or commi

17、ssion of terrorist acts.13（） A．survey B．surveillance C．survival D．surrender 3.A month ago, the British government announced a plan to keep terrorist suspects indefinitely under house arrest (1) the home secretary’s say-so, It has been attacked from all sides ever since. This week the go

18、vernment backtracked. Under the Prevention of Terrorism bill, (2) to Parliament this week, house arrest would (3) a potential (4) in the government’s ever-expanding anti-terrorist arsenal, but the government would first have to (5) of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaran

19、teeing a right to liberty. Parliament would have to vote on that.The government could do this (6) the terrorist threat to Britain, already described by the government as (7) , got even worse. Even then, the powers would remain (8) by political and judicial safeguards. Before the home secretary coul

20、d make a house-arrest order, he would have to be satisfied on the (9) of probabilities--no longer on the basis of reasonable suspicion --that the suspect has been involved in a terrorism-related activity. He would also have to be (10) that such an order was strictly required. The period of house-arr

21、est will be limited to a maximum of six months, extendable through a new house-arrest order. Within seven days of its being imposed, the High Court would have to confirm that the home secretary had (11) grounds for making such an order. Even if it were so satisfied, the case would go on to a full c

22、ourt (12) The bill also provides for a whole range of lesser restrictions including tagging, curfews, a ban on association with specified people, prohibitions on using phones, restrictions on travel, and so on. (13) to meet the threat (14) by each suspect and limited to a renewable period of 12 mont

23、hs, these would not be subject to the same judicial scrutiny as house arrest. Nor would they require (15) from the European convention.But the new orders, including house arrest, would be used only where a suspected terrorist could not be prosecuted (16) because the evidence against him was not admi

24、ssible in court, or because it might (17) intelligence sources or (18) techniques. Charles Clarke insists that he would prefer to prosecute. (19) the home secretary is considering further anti-terrorist legislation, including making it (20) to be involved in the preparation or commission of terrori

25、st acts.14（） A．supported B．hedged C．backed D．a(chǎn)ssisted 4.A month ago, the British government announced a plan to keep terrorist suspects indefinitely under house arrest (1) the home secretary’s say-so, It has been attacked from all sides ever since. This week the government backtracked.

26、Under the Prevention of Terrorism bill, (2) to Parliament this week, house arrest would (3) a potential (4) in the government’s ever-expanding anti-terrorist arsenal, but the government would first have to (5) of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing a right to libe

27、rty. Parliament would have to vote on that.The government could do this (6) the terrorist threat to Britain, already described by the government as (7) , got even worse. Even then, the powers would remain (8) by political and judicial safeguards. Before the home secretary could make a house-arrest

28、order, he would have to be satisfied on the (9) of probabilities--no longer on the basis of reasonable suspicion --that the suspect has been involved in a terrorism-related activity. He would also have to be (10) that such an order was strictly required. The period of house-arrest will be limited to

29、 a maximum of six months, extendable through a new house-arrest order. Within seven days of its being imposed, the High Court would have to confirm that the home secretary had (11) grounds for making such an order. Even if it were so satisfied, the case would go on to a full court (12) The bill als

30、o provides for a whole range of lesser restrictions including tagging, curfews, a ban on association with specified people, prohibitions on using phones, restrictions on travel, and so on. (13) to meet the threat (14) by each suspect and limited to a renewable period of 12 months, these would not be

31、 subject to the same judicial scrutiny as house arrest. Nor would they require (15) from the European convention.But the new orders, including house arrest, would be used only where a suspected terrorist could not be prosecuted (16) because the evidence against him was not admissible in court, or be

32、cause it might (17) intelligence sources or (18) techniques. Charles Clarke insists that he would prefer to prosecute. (19) the home secretary is considering further anti-terrorist legislation, including making it (20) to be involved in the preparation or commission of terrorist acts.15（） A．list

33、ening B．hearing C．inquiring D．witness 5.A month ago, the British government announced a plan to keep terrorist suspects indefinitely under house arrest (1) the home secretary’s say-so, It has been attacked from all sides ever since. This week the government backtracked. Under the Preventio

34、n of Terrorism bill, (2) to Parliament this week, house arrest would (3) a potential (4) in the government’s ever-expanding anti-terrorist arsenal, but the government would first have to (5) of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing a right to liberty. Parliament wou

35、ld have to vote on that.The government could do this (6) the terrorist threat to Britain, already described by the government as (7) , got even worse. Even then, the powers would remain (8) by political and judicial safeguards. Before the home secretary could make a house-arrest order, he would hav

36、e to be satisfied on the (9) of probabilities--no longer on the basis of reasonable suspicion --that the suspect has been involved in a terrorism-related activity. He would also have to be (10) that such an order was strictly required. The period of house-arrest will be limited to a maximum of six m

37、onths, extendable through a new house-arrest order. Within seven days of its being imposed, the High Court would have to confirm that the home secretary had (11) grounds for making such an order. Even if it were so satisfied, the case would go on to a full court (12) The bill also provides for a wh

38、ole range of lesser restrictions including tagging, curfews, a ban on association with specified people, prohibitions on using phones, restrictions on travel, and so on. (13) to meet the threat (14) by each suspect and limited to a renewable period of 12 months, these would not be subject to the sam

39、e judicial scrutiny as house arrest. Nor would they require (15) from the European convention.But the new orders, including house arrest, would be used only where a suspected terrorist could not be prosecuted (16) because the evidence against him was not admissible in court, or because it might (17)

40、 intelligence sources or (18) techniques. Charles Clarke insists that he would prefer to prosecute. (19) the home secretary is considering further anti-terrorist legislation, including making it (20) to be involved in the preparation or commission of terrorist acts.16（） A．opt for B．opt out C．b

41、e apt to D．a(chǎn)dopt 6.A month ago, the British government announced a plan to keep terrorist suspects indefinitely under house arrest (1) the home secretary’s say-so, It has been attacked from all sides ever since. This week the government backtracked. Under the Prevention of Terrorism bill, (2

42、) to Parliament this week, house arrest would (3) a potential (4) in the government’s ever-expanding anti-terrorist arsenal, but the government would first have to (5) of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing a right to liberty. Parliament would have to vote on that

43、.The government could do this (6) the terrorist threat to Britain, already described by the government as (7) , got even worse. Even then, the powers would remain (8) by political and judicial safeguards. Before the home secretary could make a house-arrest order, he would have to be satisfied on th

44、e (9) of probabilities--no longer on the basis of reasonable suspicion --that the suspect has been involved in a terrorism-related activity. He would also have to be (10) that such an order was strictly required. The period of house-arrest will be limited to a maximum of six months, extendable throu

45、gh a new house-arrest order. Within seven days of its being imposed, the High Court would have to confirm that the home secretary had (11) grounds for making such an order. Even if it were so satisfied, the case would go on to a full court (12) The bill also provides for a whole range of lesser res

46、trictions including tagging, curfews, a ban on association with specified people, prohibitions on using phones, restrictions on travel, and so on. (13) to meet the threat (14) by each suspect and limited to a renewable period of 12 months, these would not be subject to the same judicial scrutiny as

47、house arrest. Nor would they require (15) from the European convention.But the new orders, including house arrest, would be used only where a suspected terrorist could not be prosecuted (16) because the evidence against him was not admissible in court, or because it might (17) intelligence sources

48、or (18) techniques. Charles Clarke insists that he would prefer to prosecute. (19) the home secretary is considering further anti-terrorist legislation, including making it (20) to be involved in the preparation or commission of terrorist acts.17（） A．level B．equality C．balance D．might 7.A mon

49、th ago, the British government announced a plan to keep terrorist suspects indefinitely under house arrest (1) the home secretary’s say-so, It has been attacked from all sides ever since. This week the government backtracked. Under the Prevention of Terrorism bill, (2) to Parliament this week,

50、 house arrest would (3) a potential (4) in the government’s ever-expanding anti-terrorist arsenal, but the government would first have to (5) of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing a right to liberty. Parliament would have to vote on that.The government could do t

51、his (6) the terrorist threat to Britain, already described by the government as (7) , got even worse. Even then, the powers would remain (8) by political and judicial safeguards. Before the home secretary could make a house-arrest order, he would have to be satisfied on the (9) of probabilities--no

52、 longer on the basis of reasonable suspicion --that the suspect has been involved in a terrorism-related activity. He would also have to be (10) that such an order was strictly required. The period of house-arrest will be limited to a maximum of six months, extendable through a new house-arrest orde

53、r. Within seven days of its being imposed, the High Court would have to confirm that the home secretary had (11) grounds for making such an order. Even if it were so satisfied, the case would go on to a full court (12) The bill also provides for a whole range of lesser restrictions including taggin

54、g, curfews, a ban on association with specified people, prohibitions on using phones, restrictions on travel, and so on. (13) to meet the threat (14) by each suspect and limited to a renewable period of 12 months, these would not be subject to the same judicial scrutiny as house arrest. Nor would th

55、ey require (15) from the European convention.But the new orders, including house arrest, would be used only where a suspected terrorist could not be prosecuted (16) because the evidence against him was not admissible in court, or because it might (17) intelligence sources or (18) techniques. Charle

56、s Clarke insists that he would prefer to prosecute. (19) the home secretary is considering further anti-terrorist legislation, including making it (20) to be involved in the preparation or commission of terrorist acts.18（） A．met B．fulfilled C．satisfied D．gratified 8.A month ago, the British g

57、overnment announced a plan to keep terrorist suspects indefinitely under house arrest (1) the home secretary’s say-so, It has been attacked from all sides ever since. This week the government backtracked. Under the Prevention of Terrorism bill, (2) to Parliament this week, house arrest would (

58、3) a potential (4) in the government’s ever-expanding anti-terrorist arsenal, but the government would first have to (5) of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing a right to liberty. Parliament would have to vote on that.The government could do this (6) the terrorist

59、 threat to Britain, already described by the government as (7) , got even worse. Even then, the powers would remain (8) by political and judicial safeguards. Before the home secretary could make a house-arrest order, he would have to be satisfied on the (9) of probabilities--no longer on the basis

60、of reasonable suspicion --that the suspect has been involved in a terrorism-related activity. He would also have to be (10) that such an order was strictly required. The period of house-arrest will be limited to a maximum of six months, extendable through a new house-arrest order. Within seven days

61、of its being imposed, the High Court would have to confirm that the home secretary had (11) grounds for making such an order. Even if it were so satisfied, the case would go on to a full court (12) The bill also provides for a whole range of lesser restrictions including tagging, curfews, a ban on

62、association with specified people, prohibitions on using phones, restrictions on travel, and so on. (13) to meet the threat (14) by each suspect and limited to a renewable period of 12 months, these would not be subject to the same judicial scrutiny as house arrest. Nor would they require (15) from

63、the European convention.But the new orders, including house arrest, would be used only where a suspected terrorist could not be prosecuted (16) because the evidence against him was not admissible in court, or because it might (17) intelligence sources or (18) techniques. Charles Clarke insists that

64、 he would prefer to prosecute. (19) the home secretary is considering further anti-terrorist legislation, including making it (20) to be involved in the preparation or commission of terrorist acts.19（） A．unpracticed B．unpredictable C．unprepared D．unprecedented 9.A month ago, the British gover

65、nment announced a plan to keep terrorist suspects indefinitely under house arrest (1) the home secretary’s say-so, It has been attacked from all sides ever since. This week the government backtracked. Under the Prevention of Terrorism bill, (2) to Parliament this week, house arrest would (3) a

66、 potential (4) in the government’s ever-expanding anti-terrorist arsenal, but the government would first have to (5) of Article 5 of the European Convention on Human Rights guaranteeing a right to liberty. Parliament would have to vote on that.The government could do this (6) the terrorist threat to Britain, already described by the government as (7) , got even worse. Even then, the powers would remain (8) by political and judicial safeguards. Before the home secretary could make a house-